3 minutes at Commissioner Court Mtg 7 June 2016
I am Bill Kelberlau from Williamson County. I am a 6th
generation Texan. I am a retired Navy
CAPTAIN with over 25 years of active and reserve duty, and a decorated war
veteran. For those who do not know, a Navy CAPTAIN is the same as a full bird
Colonel. I am also retired from industry, GTE, Texas Instruments, and Raytheon
in many areas of management, engineering and customer service. I have been a
part of Williamson County for over 37 years.
I have some comments on several items from the Comm Court
Mtg 17 May 2016.
First, that same week Thursday the 19th I had to
turn around don't drown on the way out of my subdivision. As I stood watching
the water I discussed with one of my neighbors items 25 & 26 which was
followed by Item 22 being lumped in with a group of infrastructure items and
quickly passed. CC made quick work of supporting a major corporation's
profitability with WilCo citizens tax dollars by reprogramming 2013 bond money.
Yet after more than 35 years WilCo has yet to spend a fraction of $1.5 million it gave to the UPS project and
make a decision regarding citizen safety.
Agenda items and discussion continued into other subjects
where in many items had in common the
issue of how decisions are made and policy and procedures that should be
addressed to improve the decision and management processes within WilCo.
The county atty addressing purchasing contracts and issues
was asked what is the historical review process for purchasing contracts and
his response was, “all over the map.”
What? There is no formal process
that connects the dots between multitudes of contracts and assesses the
potential cumulative risks and or compounding liabilities being incurred? Is it safe to assume that since there is no
evaluation of these risks there is also no risk management process in place?
Commissioner Long made a comment about taking a more in depth
look at government relationships with regard to overreach. I applaud this idea.
Every time Grant money flows there is a contract. The last 2-3 pages of each contract is loaded
with over reach and or strings attached. However, does WilCo not know the
extent or cumulative impact of its risks and liabilities with regard to these
hundreds of grants already accepted?
Debt service: NPV analysis is only one analysis to evaluate
financial decisions. One must also do future value or future cost analysis to
understand the impact of decisions. Citizen's incomes being increased at the
1-2% CPI rate can't afford the continued 10% compounding each year for taxes,
insurance, regulatory costs etc that are not part of CPI. State and local debt
exceeds national debt and WilCo has the highest per capita debt of all counties
in Texas. We can have a good credit rating with a whole lot less debt. What
important opportunities are being lost into debt service?
Zero Based Budgeting, Management by Objectives and
Priorities, Internal Rate of return, PERT program management, CPM critical path
analysis, future cost of not making a decision (dollars, lives), Total Cost of
Ownership, technology forecasts and impact, unintended consequences (squeezing
the balloon), Analysis of Alternatives, convenience versus doing whats right,
Cost Benefit analyses, risk assessment, risk analysis, cost risk Monte Carlo
evaluation, and many more proven
management tools.
It appears obvious WilCo is long overdue for implementing 20th
century proven good management principles and decision making processes.
Let's start with Principle.
Is it Constitutional, is it the Truth and Cui Bono, who
benefits.
No comments:
Post a Comment