The city of Georgetown
has received considerable press and accolades for the recently announced plan
to move to 100% renewable electric energy by 2017 with contracts for wind and
solar farms. Unfortunately, there are times when the wind is not blowing and
the sun is not shining and these sources will not supply required power. During
those times, Georgetown
will rely on the grid managed by ERCOT. Last year, the grid got 88 % of its
energy from natural gas, coal, and nuclear. Therefore, Georgetown will be dependent on
non-renewables when solar and wind are inadequate. The City estimates this will
happen about 2% of the time which seems small but is about 29
minutes a day or 175 hours a year. The claim of 100% renewable is inaccurate;
wind and solar cannot meet that claim and storage technologies are not
available to back them up. This is important to understand because electric
providers are getting political and regulation pressures to put more renewables
on line. And yet, to provide consistent power, the renewables must be backed up
with fossil fuel or nuclear generators. In the end, we consumers have to pay
for this redundancy. I believe my view and concerns are shared by the Texas Public
Utility Commission Chairman, Donna Nelson who addressed this issue at Texas
Tech law school early March of this year. (http://lubbockonline.com/education/2015-03-02/public-utility-commission-chair-speaks-against-clean-power-plan-texas-tech-law#.VWPgwl1FC71)
The internet has numerous articles praising Georgetown ’s plan to go all renewable with
few mentions of the grid dependency for consistent power. My concern is the
city of Georgetown
is generating a false set of expectations regarding renewable energy. If all
utilities in Texas followed Georgetown ’s example, we would have a
disaster on our hands.
Gary Pitt
No comments:
Post a Comment