"Now that tax day has passed, I must
thank you, my fellow federal taxpayers. You all are the wind beneath my solar
panels.
Pardon me for mixing energy
metaphors, but it’s only appropriate that I express appreciation for the
generous subsidy you provided for the 28-panel, four-array, 8,540-watt
photovoltaic system I installed on my metal roof last year. Thanks to the
investment tax credit, I slashed my 2016 federal tax bill by $7,758.
Before going further, let me be
clear: I’m opposed to all energy subsidies—unless, of course, I’m the one
collecting them. And thanks to the incentives for rooftop solar, I’ve snared
three subsidies.
In addition to the federal subsidy,
Austin Energy (our city-owned utility) paid $6,593 of the cost of my system.
Thus, after subtracting local and federal subsidies, the net cost of my
8.54-kilowatt system was $18,100, or about $2.12 per watt of installed capacity.
I’m also getting an ongoing subsidy that pays me far more for the electricity I
produce than what other generators get in the Texas wholesale market.
My panels are producing about 12
megawatt-hours of electricity per year. In 2016, according to the Electric
Reliability Council of Texas, the average wholesale price of electricity was
$24.62 per megawatt-hour. But Austin Energy pays me $106 for each megawatt-hour
my system produces. Therefore, I’m getting more than four times as much for my
solar electricity as other generators in Texas. I get that price regardless of
whether the grid needs the juice from my panels or not.
In the 12 months since I installed
the system, half of my monthly electric bills are showing up with a negative
balance. I figure my solar panels will pay back their cost in 14 years and that
the return on my investment is about 7%.
Recently, one of my neighbors also
had panels installed. But fewer rooftop solar projects are being installed in
low-income neighborhoods. That’s true in California, which leads the country in
solar-energy capacity. According to a study done for the California Public
Utility Commission, residents who have installed solar systems have household
incomes 68% higher than the state average. Ashley Brown, executive director of
the Harvard Electricity Policy Group, calls the proliferation of rooftop solar
systems and the returns they provide to lucky people like me, “a wealth
transfer from less affluent ratepayers to more affluent ones.” It is, Mr. Brown
says, “Robin Hood in reverse.”
Do I feel bad about being a solar
freeloader? Yes, a little. As Mr. Brown and others have noted, I’m now paying
less to maintain the electric grid. That means that the local barista or school
janitor—people who likely can’t afford solar panels—are paying incrementally
more for the grid’s maintenance and operation. And the more that people like me
install panels, the more those baristas and janitors have to pay.
But don’t trouble me with all that.
I’m doing my part for the polar bears. Indeed, I’m a prime example of the
“green” economy: I’m socializing the costs of my scheme and privatizing the
profits. And I’m feeling virtuous while doing so.
It doesn’t get much better than
that."
Even though this article focuses on solar panels installed on individuals homes, the same principles apply to publicly owned utility companies like Georgetown's electric utility. The residents of Georgetown are getting a great deal on the price of their wind and solar generated electricity because the generating plants are subsidized through tax credits, low interest government guaranteed loans, property tax relief and other subsidy mechanisms.
As the article author says, we in Georgetown are socializing the cost of the "green" electricity and reaping the savings at the expense of others in this country. So enjoy it while you can!
No comments:
Post a Comment