Thursday, October 10, 2019

More Info on the City Electric Debacle

From the editorial page of the Williamson County Sun.

"When the electric mess erupted late last year, we began working to tell you what was happening, and how it happened. It was tough going, because the city has a policy of keeping the workings of the electric department secret, mainly on the premise that the city competed with other electric providers and shouldn’t play with cards exposed. 

Most of us accepted the secrecy, trusting that our council and staff would do the right thing on our behalf. We were misinformed. 

It is now clear that the movement to go 100 percent renewable was able to advance with no apparent challenge, because the true facts were closely held, and we citizens heard only the utopian promises of cheap, fixed-price electricity for 25 years to come. 

When the bubble burst last November, and everyone finally realized what a mess it was, we started asking questions. Everyone already knew the city had signed on to buy twice as much wind and solar power as we use, planning to sell the surplus on the open market. But the city had never made clear the financial risk this 100 percent plan exposed us to. 

By the time the wind farm started up in October 2015, natural gas prices had been in a slow decline for years and electricity prices had become so low that the city immediately started losing money on its sale of surplus power. 

Since the low gas price was the cause of the problem, our reporter, Charlotte Kovalchuk, asked Jim Briggs, utility manager at the time, how high the price of natural gas had to go before we stopped losing money. Mr. Briggs declined to answer, saying that if he did, she might be able to calculate the price of our wind and solar contracts. These prices were secret and could not be divulged. 

The solar and wind contracts have non-disclosure clauses that prevent the city from releasing the contract prices. These clauses are, in reality, gag orders on everyone who joins the staff or council for the next 23 years. It’s CIA-grade secrecy, and to what purpose? To keep you from knowing a price that anyone can look up on the internet. Yes, it’s that simple. 

In May, the U.S. Energy Information Administration posted on its website the annual statistical report for 2018 on 5,343 electricity plants in the U.S. The report lists the annual production of each plant and how much money it brought in. For Buckthorn solar with its single customer, Georgetown, and for the Spinning Spur 3 wind farm with only two customers, Georgetown and Garland, it’s easy to calculate the price we pay. Below are the numbers.

Buckthorn Solar farm 
Megawatt hours sold: 198,020 
Revenue: $8,975,000 
Per megawatt hour: $45.32 

Spinning Spur 3 wind farm 
Megawatt hours sold: 845,262 (Garland and Georgetown combined) 
Revenue: $21,115,000 
Per megawatt hour: $24.98

So now you have the secret numbers. $25 for wind and $45 for solar. What good is that? Not much, in and of itself. 

Sources in the Texas power industry tell me that everyone in the industry knows about Georgetown’s predicament. And those who want to know — do know — the financial details. 

In the end, it appears the city’s policy of secrecy is aimed primarily at its own citizens. 

Since the price is publicly available, why do the wind and solar companies, and the city, persist in keeping the contracts secret? Why can’t they agree to a contract amendment that deletes the non-disclosure clause? 

Or, if the city were to release the contracts unilaterally, what harm could the companies claim if they wanted to sue us? The price is public knowledge — is there something else in the contracts potentially more damaging if it were known? 

As it stands today, this electric mess is the biggest financial debacle in Georgetown’s history. I’m convinced this would not have happened had there been open, honest discussion about the details, discussion about how this 100 percent idea might actually work in the real world. 

Someone might have pointed out that, however good it sounded in theory, it couldn’t work in reality without spending a great deal of ratepayer money.  Which is what we’re doing. 

Georgetown would be well served if our city council would move city policy away from this bias towards secrecy."

Stay tuned, there is more to come!

No comments:

Post a Comment